Even a non-binding letter of intent may contain legal commitments, such as. B a provision that requires confidentiality and non-disclosure of the contents of the letter. When developing a contract, the focus should be on formalizing the contract. In other words, if certain steps or rules are not followed, you may have a contract that is not legally binding. Agreements are generally established in such a way that the company operating the online auction site only presents sellers to potential buyers. Scenario 3: The parties` agreement remains silent on unconscluded issues Often, pre-contract documents contain a non-binding overview of the terms agreed in principle by the parties, so that the parties can see how close they are to an agreement and provide a framework for future negotiations. However, pre-contracting documents can be used to define certain binding conditions, with confidentiality being a perfect example. Even if these elements are present in the treaty, there are conditions under which the contract would not yet be binding. For example, the question of whether they are not legally binding is another question. The Victorian Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in The Edge Development Group Pty Ltd v. Jack Road Investments Pty Ltd.1.

As the letter of offer was “subordinate to the performance of the contract,” the Tribunal ultimately found that the letter was not binding. The existence of a legally binding agreement depends on the presence of all the elements of a contractual relationship. If this is the case, the document could be an “intermediate contract” until a full formal agreement is concluded or a simple contract in its current form. If all the elements are not in place, the pre-contracting documents may simply be an agreement that can be reached and such an agreement will not be legally binding. The Tribunal found that this was a clear case within the third class of Masters/Cameron, since condition 4 was that the offer was “subject to the performance of the contract”. The Court cited Masters/Cameron and stated that the term “contract” and similar expressions meant that any agreement should be considered “the basis for a future contract and not as a contractual element”.” 5 If we reduce the contract to its simplest definition, then a valid contract (or binding contract) is in fact only an enforceable promise.

Download PDF