I’m a Mother and legal guardian of my 29 year old, high-functioning Autistic daughter. Ten years ago, she was disenfranchised of her inheritance, sanctioned by the Probate Court in Westchester County, New York. NY almost leads the nation in corruption, particularly of the Judicial and political arenas. Governed by a mob-connected and incapable Governor (Andrew Cuomo), NY has its best days behind it, crushing the middle class to the point of record exiting of citizens. This week, May 22nd, I will be on the Marti Oakley podcase describing our story and seeking signatures for the Petition I started at Care2Petition.com.(5/22) I would like to “plug”your site as well, but seek your permission
Please say yay or nay at the above email site. Thank you for organizing such a valuable site.
To begin with Edra Smiley is not a social worker. Or more accurately, Edra Smiley has not worked a day as a Social Worker since 2001 when she was permanently blacklisted from the profession. She was banned in large part because of an incident of child abuse against her only child that was investigated by El Cajon police department. Specifically El Cajon PD detective Roy Ward and Santee Sheriff Andrew Burrows. A neighbor of Edra Smileys had called the police and brought in a child who had suffered an extreme beating from a metal belt buckle and was bleeding trough her clothing. Since Edra Smiley refused to talk to investigators, they contacted Edra Smiley’s supervisor at Child Protective Services(CPS). Edra’s supervisor investigated the situation and did what employees of CPS do, he created a confidential court report called in California a “Welfare code 300” on the incident. The agreement reached between detective Roy Ward and Edra Smiley’s supervisor was that her 15 year old daughter was never to return home for reasons of extreme physical abuse. Thus at age 15 the child became a Dependent of the Court. The report by Edra’s Supervisor was permanently inserted into Edra’s human resources file when she left the employment of San Bernardino County CPS in 2001. The following is a small excerpt from the nearly 500 page lawsuit Smiley Vs San Bernardino Department of Children Services (case no SCVSS 092063). Edra Smiley in her own words writes in the final Plaintiff’s Case Management Status Report:
“Defendant County had inserted documentation into the Plaintiffs personnel file that Plaintiff would not be considered for “rehire” under any conditions and was rated as a “substandard” worker. It appears that in order to support the premise of this “rating” the defendant County had placed a Confidential Court Report involving a Dependent Child of the Court under the Welfare and Institutions Code 300 and a letter from a co-worker into the personnel file of the Plaintiff”
Thus all claims made by Edra Smiley that she has worked as a Social Worker since 2001 are complete lies. Edra Smiley has gone to extensive lengths to maintain this elaborate lie. She has taken the West Virginia Social Worker licensing exam and created a shell entity titled Gabriel’s Enrichment Training Services(GETS). Edra Smiley claims to work for GETS but GETS is no more real than a cartoon Disney fairy tale and has never seen a single dollar much less anything needing the services of a social worker. Yet Edra Smiley has time and time again lied in court and other places stating that she has a current practice as a social worker both in West Virginia and California.
Edra does this because it increases her appearance of credibility, something that is needed when just about everything she says is a complete lie. On 03/23/2009 the Circuit Court of Kanawha County West Virginia (civil action 04-C-382) issued an order granting directed verdict to all defendants in a civil suit where Edra Smiley was the primary witness and her sister Brenda J Watton was the Plaintiff, self represented. In this short seven page decision the West Virginia courts details how Edra Smiley impeached herself on the witness stand and this resulted in the entire case being thrown out:
“The evidence that came closest to bearing on the special relationship came from testimony of Edra Smiley who testified on cross-examination that the employees of the WVDEP made the promise to make others not take Plaintiffs’ dirt for use at the landfill in question. Ms. Smiley was impeached with her own discovery deposition testimony, wherein she testified that the WVDEP’s employees did not make any promises to stop others from taking the dirt. Her explanation to that impeachment was that she would have to match up the videotape of the discovery deposition with the written transcript. The Court finds that the testimony of Edra Smiley regarding said promise was inherently incredible given the impeachment presented and her testimony on the issue. The Court believes that if any reasonable person was present and saw Ms. Smiley’s demeanor, they would have found Ms. Smiley to have been argumentative and revengeful in offering such testimony due to the manner in which she presented it. As such, the testimony of Edra Smiley in that regard cannot be the sole basis that permits Plaintiff to have the issues in this case resolved by a jury. The Court recognizes that it is a rare ruling to take credibility determination away from a jury, but given the demeanor of Edra Smiley and the impeachment of her testimony presented to the jury on that issue, Edra Smiley’s testimony on that issue was inherently incredible.”
Edra Smiley is a master manipulator and uses another powerful tool to give the appearance of credibility. That tool is the good reputation of others. Edra would like the world to believe that the $183,000 in damages that is currently being collected from her was the result of court room corruption. Instead they were the result of her own attempt to take quiet title(according to two Lis Pendens filed by Attorney Brian Karr in the Kanawha County Assessors office) and associated actions that failed miserably.
Edra Smiley has been relentless and unwavering in her pursuit of her victims. She has pursued them over decades, and in one case filling more than 1000 legal motions against a single person. Losing every single motion has not stoped her one bit. Please do not help Edra Smiley commit fraud and victimize others by lending your good name to her activities. Thank you for your time.
“Whether or not you like or approve of the truth being spoken has no bearing on its veracity.”
—Anonymous
To ‘anonymous’ author — get off trying to look ‘intellectual’, I doubt seriously you even graduated high school. Your just a ‘troll’, pervert, stalker that preys upon other people. Get a job! ( a real job), make some friends, get a life.
Edra Smiley’s credibility is best summed up by this court ruling:
drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzuc2QO_ZOlGX09qVktMZGhuWEk/view?usp=sharing
By the way, when you just publish the court opinion and let the world make up their own mind that is by definition not slander legally or otherwise. And get a clue, ad hominem is generally viewed as an admission of guilt. If you don’t know what that means then my telling you wont help you.
Following the Smiley case referenced by internet trolls Anon Ymous and Probable Cause (Clever NO – COWARDLY – YOU BET! Just another attempt to defame, discredit, harass, intimidate, slander whistleblower Smiley to cover up major corruption in the West Virginia judiciary (inclusive of the corrupt attorneys in collusion with corrupt judges.) The BIG picture involved in the Smiley equity case IS the inherent Constitutional right OF EVERY CITIZEN to OWN private property and to exclude trespassers. THAT’S THE BIGGIE going on! The FACTS SPEAK — Smiley is the property owner and the trespassers are NOT and have NEVER at anytime in history had any legal rights, to invade, bulldoze, MINE the Smiley private property (STEALING OVER 5 TO 7 ACRES OF CLAY SOIL (equating to $14 million dollars) for the ‘cover soil’ of a permitted closed solid waste landfill containing hazardous waste. Smiley was granted permanent injunction against the trespassers on September 27, 2010. See WV Supreme Court OF Appeals defendant/trespassers ‘Writ of Mandamus’ Case No. 101422 (Nov. 5 2010). See Smiley’s reply brief to defendants ‘Writ of Mandamus’; See Honorable Judge Webster’s Reply brief (12-2010). SEE WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS ORDER NO. 101422 dated January 13, 2011. TRESPASSERS WERE REFUSED ANY LEGAL RIGHTS. Mandamus law applies. See facebook: Westvirginiacorruptcourtsjudges. See: westvirginiacorruptjudgesmagistrates.blog In fact, contact WV Supreme Court Justice Robin Davis and present to Justice Davis the following question: 1)Can a three year post trial administrative subsequent judge (from another county) overturn, change the rulings of their predecessor Judges; can the three year post trial subsequent administrative judge by and through ‘no court hearings’ simply sign and execute an order authored, prepared by the losing corrupt attorney (3 YRS after the trial), reverse all the evidence, i.e facts, over rule Res Judicata, Statute of limitations, expert witness testimony, witness testimony, judicial admissions of the trespassers, ignore the laws, give property rights and damages to intruder trespassers that have caused major damage to the private property of Smiley. THE FOLLOWING IS CITED: ‘The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, ‘when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution and he is in that case stripped of his official representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The state has no power to impart to him immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts NOT as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). Further: ‘when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and THE judges orders are VOID, OF NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT.’ [Citations omitted] By the way, Anon Ymous & Probable Cause (internet trolls) — ‘ad hominem’ argument ?– seriously? really? Further: ‘ Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is ‘without authority its judgments and orders are regarded as NULLITIES. They are NOT voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to recovery sought, EVEN prior to a reversal in opposition to them. THEY CONSTITUTE NO JUSTIFICATION; AND ALL PERSONS CONCERNED IN EXECUTING SUCH JUDGMENTS ARE CONSIDERED IN LAW, AS TRESPASSERS.’ [citations omitted] FURTHER: ‘When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a VOID ORDER (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction) they become trespassers of the law and are engaged in treason.’ [Citations omitted]
The LEGAL EAGLES for the internet trolls, Anon Ymous & Probable Cause ARE SIMPLY FULL OF BIRD SH*T.
Rei your post had to be the funniest thing I’ve seen in years. Why? Because it’s obvious that you are a sock puppet! Let me list the numerous ways you reveal yourself to be a sock puppet:
-Rei your writing ‘style’ is identical to the ‘writing’ ‘style’ of ‘No Probable Cause.’ I can’t seem to ‘explain’ how the two are the ‘same’ but ‘there’ just ‘seems’ to ‘me’ that both of ‘you’ just ‘might’ be the ‘worst’ abusers of ‘quotation’ marks in all of human history.
-Rei you state that you have been following the smiley case. That is a dead giveaway that you are a sock puppet because the only people following the Smiley case are Edra’s imaginary supporters. If your supporters are real then why are you constantly whipping out the sock puppet?
-Edra’s use of ‘logic.’ Rei your argument writing style is worse than a babbling spun tweaker and makes NO LOGICAL SENSE. Once again this is identical to Edra
-Did I mention THE EGREGIOUS ABUSE OF CAPS LOCK?
But the funniest bit of all is that you don’t realize that if one fails completely by delivering a totally incoherent argument, using a sock puppet to do the same won’t change anything. The are both incoherent.
Edra you may be master of your imaginary world but you fail totally when you strive to influence in the real world. So run along now back to your imaginary existence so your imaginary supporters can reassure you that what you say is logical, coherent and makes sense.
Re: Anon Ymous the individual you are attacking, harassing, stalking is a whistleblower and is protected under whistleblower laws. Ms. Smiley’s case has been proven! Under what law, case law, code, statute, do you proclaim that supports that ‘non-owner intruder trespassers’ can legally enter onto the private property of the property owner and invade, destroy, bulldoze the private property of another? What state law, what federal law, do you use to support the ‘taking’ of private property without providing compensation to the owner? Smiley has owned her private property for over 60 years and was owned by her great grandparents prior to that time. So under ‘what law’ do you proclaim that ‘non-owner intruders’ that have never had ownership of any property and that are known criminals in the community can LEGALLY invade, bulldoze, destroy the Smiley private property? As well, Anon Ymous (or better said Troll), let me help you out — “res ispa loquitor” (The ‘thing’ speaks for itself.)
To: Anon Ymous, Seen your tirade and couldn’t resist sending you a couple of drops of wisdom. – Socrates, ” When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” MORON, you’ve proven you lost the case! What does anything you have blogged have to do with the ‘taking of this person’s private property without the state paying for it? MORON! Simply a MORON! All you’ve brought to the table is ‘hate’. Which leads to another pearl of wisdom from Kathleen Norris, ‘Hate is all a lie, there is no truth in hate.’ MORON, your blog is hate speech. It’s a crime! Last little bit to share with you: An uneducated father with his educated son went on a camping trip. They setup their tent and fell asleep. Some hours later the father woke up his son. The Father: “Look up to the sky and tell me what you see.” The Son: “I see millions of stars.” The Father: “And what does that tell you?” The Son: “Astronomically, it tells that there are millions of galaxies and planet’s.” Father slapped the son on the head and said, “Idiot, someone has stolen our tent.” Moral: To much education can spoil common sense. — Do you get it????
On 03/23/2009 the Circuit Court of Kanawha County West Virginia (civil action 04-C-382) issued an order granting directed verdict to all defendants in a civil suit where Edra Smiley was the primary witness and her sister Brenda J Watton was the Plaintiff, self represented. In this short seven page decision the West Virginia courts details how Edra Smiley impeached herself on the witness stand and this resulted in the entire case being thrown out:
“The evidence that came closest to bearing on the special relationship came from testimony of Edra Smiley who testified on cross-examination that the employees of the WVDEP made the promise to make others not take Plaintiffs’ dirt for use at the landfill in question. Ms. Smiley was impeached with her own discovery deposition testimony, wherein she testified that the WVDEP’s employees did not make any promises to stop others from taking the dirt. Her explanation to that impeachment was that she would have to match up the videotape of the discovery deposition with the written transcript. The Court finds that the testimony of Edra Smiley regarding said promise was inherently incredible given the impeachment presented and her testimony on the issue. The Court believes that if any reasonable person was present and saw Ms. Smiley’s demeanor, they would have found Ms. Smiley to have been argumentative and revengeful in offering such testimony due to the manner in which she presented it. As such, the testimony of Edra Smiley in that regard cannot be the sole basis that permits Plaintiff to have the issues in this case resolved by a jury. The Court recognizes that it is a rare ruling to take credibility determination away from a jury, but given the demeanor of Edra Smiley and the impeachment of her testimony presented to the jury on that issue, Edra Smiley’s testimony on that issue was inherently incredible.”
Everything that Edra Smiley says is a lie. Everything. The full text of civil action 04-C-382 can be found at the Kanawha County WV county clerk’s office:
Kanawha County Clerk’s Office
409 Virginia Street East
Charleston, WV 25301
This Blog and the GLOOG website are dedicated to
serving the ' John Does ' of
America who feel their efforts
and vote are not doing any
good and things are just getting
worse. It will reveal the true nature
& composition of the cancer
that is eating away at our
culture and the great
American spirit.
Yes, there is an easy way in which each and every John Doe can re-establish America's foundation and the greatness that was built on it . GLOOG is the surgical tool that every American can use to rid our country of the cancer that has spread. It is the 'All American Weapon'.
It is simple and powerful. It is the ballot box.
- VOTE & GLOOG -
at 6:33 am
A property owner (56 yrs) and victim of a corrupt West Virginia Judicial system.
at 8:56 am
hello test
at 4:14 pm
I’m a Mother and legal guardian of my 29 year old, high-functioning Autistic daughter. Ten years ago, she was disenfranchised of her inheritance, sanctioned by the Probate Court in Westchester County, New York. NY almost leads the nation in corruption, particularly of the Judicial and political arenas. Governed by a mob-connected and incapable Governor (Andrew Cuomo), NY has its best days behind it, crushing the middle class to the point of record exiting of citizens. This week, May 22nd, I will be on the Marti Oakley podcase describing our story and seeking signatures for the Petition I started at Care2Petition.com.(5/22) I would like to “plug”your site as well, but seek your permission
Please say yay or nay at the above email site. Thank you for organizing such a valuable site.
Regards,
am
at 2:41 pm
To begin with Edra Smiley is not a social worker. Or more accurately, Edra Smiley has not worked a day as a Social Worker since 2001 when she was permanently blacklisted from the profession. She was banned in large part because of an incident of child abuse against her only child that was investigated by El Cajon police department. Specifically El Cajon PD detective Roy Ward and Santee Sheriff Andrew Burrows. A neighbor of Edra Smileys had called the police and brought in a child who had suffered an extreme beating from a metal belt buckle and was bleeding trough her clothing. Since Edra Smiley refused to talk to investigators, they contacted Edra Smiley’s supervisor at Child Protective Services(CPS). Edra’s supervisor investigated the situation and did what employees of CPS do, he created a confidential court report called in California a “Welfare code 300” on the incident. The agreement reached between detective Roy Ward and Edra Smiley’s supervisor was that her 15 year old daughter was never to return home for reasons of extreme physical abuse. Thus at age 15 the child became a Dependent of the Court. The report by Edra’s Supervisor was permanently inserted into Edra’s human resources file when she left the employment of San Bernardino County CPS in 2001. The following is a small excerpt from the nearly 500 page lawsuit Smiley Vs San Bernardino Department of Children Services (case no SCVSS 092063). Edra Smiley in her own words writes in the final Plaintiff’s Case Management Status Report:
“Defendant County had inserted documentation into the Plaintiffs personnel file that Plaintiff would not be considered for “rehire” under any conditions and was rated as a “substandard” worker. It appears that in order to support the premise of this “rating” the defendant County had placed a Confidential Court Report involving a Dependent Child of the Court under the Welfare and Institutions Code 300 and a letter from a co-worker into the personnel file of the Plaintiff”
Thus all claims made by Edra Smiley that she has worked as a Social Worker since 2001 are complete lies. Edra Smiley has gone to extensive lengths to maintain this elaborate lie. She has taken the West Virginia Social Worker licensing exam and created a shell entity titled Gabriel’s Enrichment Training Services(GETS). Edra Smiley claims to work for GETS but GETS is no more real than a cartoon Disney fairy tale and has never seen a single dollar much less anything needing the services of a social worker. Yet Edra Smiley has time and time again lied in court and other places stating that she has a current practice as a social worker both in West Virginia and California.
Edra does this because it increases her appearance of credibility, something that is needed when just about everything she says is a complete lie. On 03/23/2009 the Circuit Court of Kanawha County West Virginia (civil action 04-C-382) issued an order granting directed verdict to all defendants in a civil suit where Edra Smiley was the primary witness and her sister Brenda J Watton was the Plaintiff, self represented. In this short seven page decision the West Virginia courts details how Edra Smiley impeached herself on the witness stand and this resulted in the entire case being thrown out:
“The evidence that came closest to bearing on the special relationship came from testimony of Edra Smiley who testified on cross-examination that the employees of the WVDEP made the promise to make others not take Plaintiffs’ dirt for use at the landfill in question. Ms. Smiley was impeached with her own discovery deposition testimony, wherein she testified that the WVDEP’s employees did not make any promises to stop others from taking the dirt. Her explanation to that impeachment was that she would have to match up the videotape of the discovery deposition with the written transcript. The Court finds that the testimony of Edra Smiley regarding said promise was inherently incredible given the impeachment presented and her testimony on the issue. The Court believes that if any reasonable person was present and saw Ms. Smiley’s demeanor, they would have found Ms. Smiley to have been argumentative and revengeful in offering such testimony due to the manner in which she presented it. As such, the testimony of Edra Smiley in that regard cannot be the sole basis that permits Plaintiff to have the issues in this case resolved by a jury. The Court recognizes that it is a rare ruling to take credibility determination away from a jury, but given the demeanor of Edra Smiley and the impeachment of her testimony presented to the jury on that issue, Edra Smiley’s testimony on that issue was inherently incredible.”
Edra Smiley is a master manipulator and uses another powerful tool to give the appearance of credibility. That tool is the good reputation of others. Edra would like the world to believe that the $183,000 in damages that is currently being collected from her was the result of court room corruption. Instead they were the result of her own attempt to take quiet title(according to two Lis Pendens filed by Attorney Brian Karr in the Kanawha County Assessors office) and associated actions that failed miserably.
Edra Smiley has been relentless and unwavering in her pursuit of her victims. She has pursued them over decades, and in one case filling more than 1000 legal motions against a single person. Losing every single motion has not stoped her one bit. Please do not help Edra Smiley commit fraud and victimize others by lending your good name to her activities. Thank you for your time.
“Whether or not you like or approve of the truth being spoken has no bearing on its veracity.”
—Anonymous
at 3:53 am
To ‘anonymous’ author — get off trying to look ‘intellectual’, I doubt seriously you even graduated high school. Your just a ‘troll’, pervert, stalker that preys upon other people. Get a job! ( a real job), make some friends, get a life.
at 10:29 am
Edra Smiley’s credibility is best summed up by this court ruling:
drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzuc2QO_ZOlGX09qVktMZGhuWEk/view?usp=sharing
By the way, when you just publish the court opinion and let the world make up their own mind that is by definition not slander legally or otherwise. And get a clue, ad hominem is generally viewed as an admission of guilt. If you don’t know what that means then my telling you wont help you.
at 10:48 am
Following the Smiley case referenced by internet trolls Anon Ymous and Probable Cause (Clever NO – COWARDLY – YOU BET! Just another attempt to defame, discredit, harass, intimidate, slander whistleblower Smiley to cover up major corruption in the West Virginia judiciary (inclusive of the corrupt attorneys in collusion with corrupt judges.) The BIG picture involved in the Smiley equity case IS the inherent Constitutional right OF EVERY CITIZEN to OWN private property and to exclude trespassers. THAT’S THE BIGGIE going on! The FACTS SPEAK — Smiley is the property owner and the trespassers are NOT and have NEVER at anytime in history had any legal rights, to invade, bulldoze, MINE the Smiley private property (STEALING OVER 5 TO 7 ACRES OF CLAY SOIL (equating to $14 million dollars) for the ‘cover soil’ of a permitted closed solid waste landfill containing hazardous waste. Smiley was granted permanent injunction against the trespassers on September 27, 2010. See WV Supreme Court OF Appeals defendant/trespassers ‘Writ of Mandamus’ Case No. 101422 (Nov. 5 2010). See Smiley’s reply brief to defendants ‘Writ of Mandamus’; See Honorable Judge Webster’s Reply brief (12-2010). SEE WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS ORDER NO. 101422 dated January 13, 2011. TRESPASSERS WERE REFUSED ANY LEGAL RIGHTS. Mandamus law applies. See facebook: Westvirginiacorruptcourtsjudges. See: westvirginiacorruptjudgesmagistrates.blog In fact, contact WV Supreme Court Justice Robin Davis and present to Justice Davis the following question: 1)Can a three year post trial administrative subsequent judge (from another county) overturn, change the rulings of their predecessor Judges; can the three year post trial subsequent administrative judge by and through ‘no court hearings’ simply sign and execute an order authored, prepared by the losing corrupt attorney (3 YRS after the trial), reverse all the evidence, i.e facts, over rule Res Judicata, Statute of limitations, expert witness testimony, witness testimony, judicial admissions of the trespassers, ignore the laws, give property rights and damages to intruder trespassers that have caused major damage to the private property of Smiley. THE FOLLOWING IS CITED: ‘The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, ‘when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution and he is in that case stripped of his official representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The state has no power to impart to him immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts NOT as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). Further: ‘when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and THE judges orders are VOID, OF NO LEGAL FORCE OR EFFECT.’ [Citations omitted] By the way, Anon Ymous & Probable Cause (internet trolls) — ‘ad hominem’ argument ?– seriously? really? Further: ‘ Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is ‘without authority its judgments and orders are regarded as NULLITIES. They are NOT voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to recovery sought, EVEN prior to a reversal in opposition to them. THEY CONSTITUTE NO JUSTIFICATION; AND ALL PERSONS CONCERNED IN EXECUTING SUCH JUDGMENTS ARE CONSIDERED IN LAW, AS TRESPASSERS.’ [citations omitted] FURTHER: ‘When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a VOID ORDER (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction) they become trespassers of the law and are engaged in treason.’ [Citations omitted]
The LEGAL EAGLES for the internet trolls, Anon Ymous & Probable Cause ARE SIMPLY FULL OF BIRD SH*T.
at 10:37 am
Rei your post had to be the funniest thing I’ve seen in years. Why? Because it’s obvious that you are a sock puppet! Let me list the numerous ways you reveal yourself to be a sock puppet:
-Rei your writing ‘style’ is identical to the ‘writing’ ‘style’ of ‘No Probable Cause.’ I can’t seem to ‘explain’ how the two are the ‘same’ but ‘there’ just ‘seems’ to ‘me’ that both of ‘you’ just ‘might’ be the ‘worst’ abusers of ‘quotation’ marks in all of human history.
-Rei you state that you have been following the smiley case. That is a dead giveaway that you are a sock puppet because the only people following the Smiley case are Edra’s imaginary supporters. If your supporters are real then why are you constantly whipping out the sock puppet?
-Edra’s use of ‘logic.’ Rei your argument writing style is worse than a babbling spun tweaker and makes NO LOGICAL SENSE. Once again this is identical to Edra
-Did I mention THE EGREGIOUS ABUSE OF CAPS LOCK?
But the funniest bit of all is that you don’t realize that if one fails completely by delivering a totally incoherent argument, using a sock puppet to do the same won’t change anything. The are both incoherent.
Edra you may be master of your imaginary world but you fail totally when you strive to influence in the real world. So run along now back to your imaginary existence so your imaginary supporters can reassure you that what you say is logical, coherent and makes sense.
at 5:27 pm
Rei one other thing that proves that you are really No Probable Cause is that you wrote most of your post in the first instead of the third person.
at 7:33 am
Re: Anon Ymous the individual you are attacking, harassing, stalking is a whistleblower and is protected under whistleblower laws. Ms. Smiley’s case has been proven! Under what law, case law, code, statute, do you proclaim that supports that ‘non-owner intruder trespassers’ can legally enter onto the private property of the property owner and invade, destroy, bulldoze the private property of another? What state law, what federal law, do you use to support the ‘taking’ of private property without providing compensation to the owner? Smiley has owned her private property for over 60 years and was owned by her great grandparents prior to that time. So under ‘what law’ do you proclaim that ‘non-owner intruders’ that have never had ownership of any property and that are known criminals in the community can LEGALLY invade, bulldoze, destroy the Smiley private property? As well, Anon Ymous (or better said Troll), let me help you out — “res ispa loquitor” (The ‘thing’ speaks for itself.)
at 6:15 am
To: Anon Ymous, Seen your tirade and couldn’t resist sending you a couple of drops of wisdom. – Socrates, ” When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” MORON, you’ve proven you lost the case! What does anything you have blogged have to do with the ‘taking of this person’s private property without the state paying for it? MORON! Simply a MORON! All you’ve brought to the table is ‘hate’. Which leads to another pearl of wisdom from Kathleen Norris, ‘Hate is all a lie, there is no truth in hate.’ MORON, your blog is hate speech. It’s a crime! Last little bit to share with you: An uneducated father with his educated son went on a camping trip. They setup their tent and fell asleep. Some hours later the father woke up his son. The Father: “Look up to the sky and tell me what you see.” The Son: “I see millions of stars.” The Father: “And what does that tell you?” The Son: “Astronomically, it tells that there are millions of galaxies and planet’s.” Father slapped the son on the head and said, “Idiot, someone has stolen our tent.” Moral: To much education can spoil common sense. — Do you get it????
at 11:24 pm
Will the real Edra Smiley please stand up?
On 03/23/2009 the Circuit Court of Kanawha County West Virginia (civil action 04-C-382) issued an order granting directed verdict to all defendants in a civil suit where Edra Smiley was the primary witness and her sister Brenda J Watton was the Plaintiff, self represented. In this short seven page decision the West Virginia courts details how Edra Smiley impeached herself on the witness stand and this resulted in the entire case being thrown out:
“The evidence that came closest to bearing on the special relationship came from testimony of Edra Smiley who testified on cross-examination that the employees of the WVDEP made the promise to make others not take Plaintiffs’ dirt for use at the landfill in question. Ms. Smiley was impeached with her own discovery deposition testimony, wherein she testified that the WVDEP’s employees did not make any promises to stop others from taking the dirt. Her explanation to that impeachment was that she would have to match up the videotape of the discovery deposition with the written transcript. The Court finds that the testimony of Edra Smiley regarding said promise was inherently incredible given the impeachment presented and her testimony on the issue. The Court believes that if any reasonable person was present and saw Ms. Smiley’s demeanor, they would have found Ms. Smiley to have been argumentative and revengeful in offering such testimony due to the manner in which she presented it. As such, the testimony of Edra Smiley in that regard cannot be the sole basis that permits Plaintiff to have the issues in this case resolved by a jury. The Court recognizes that it is a rare ruling to take credibility determination away from a jury, but given the demeanor of Edra Smiley and the impeachment of her testimony presented to the jury on that issue, Edra Smiley’s testimony on that issue was inherently incredible.”
Everything that Edra Smiley says is a lie. Everything. The full text of civil action 04-C-382 can be found at the Kanawha County WV county clerk’s office:
Kanawha County Clerk’s Office
409 Virginia Street East
Charleston, WV 25301