The case is often cross-referenced with the “successors and parties to the assignment” or “parties in interest” clauses that control whether the successors or beneficiaries of the transfer can assume the rights and obligations arising from the contract. As we are on the point, this type of clause will not be relevant to most employers (read “unnecessary”?). What for? First, copyrighted works are subject to an established rent. What types of works are copyrighted? For example, works of art, works that are part of a video or film, other audiovisual works, music, works that may appear in a manual, an atlas, etc. Why would a work clause not be relevant, if not unnecessary, for many employers? Employers whose workers create this type of work would still want to claim property rights over them, wouldn`t they? The answer is that the law assumes that such work, which was created by a worker within the framework and extent of his employment relationship, is the property of the employer. We know this because the U.S. Supreme Court told us at Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithography Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903). Does this mean that companies never need a work clause in a contract? Not quite. If you own a business and use independent contractors to create the types of works created by copyright, you need a factory clause. Some companies will continue to intend to include a commitment clause in their employment contracts to draw the worker`s attention to the fact that such work is the property of the employer. While it is not necessary, some employers believe that the psychological value is worth it.

Depending on the terms of the contract, the contract may or may not be binding after the sale of a business. The continuation of the employment contract depends on the existence of a survival clause or a transfer clause under the contractual terms. These clauses determine how the staff contract works in the event of a company being sold. Hey, Alex! First of all, congratulations on your last graduation ceremony. Contracting often contains phrases sometimes called “boilerplate” language to ensure that all bases are covered. In general, someone who wants a WMFH clause in a contract is concerned about the protection of all of their intellectual property, whether real or potential. Copyright laws are an aspect of intellectual property law. Products may have aspects that require both patents and copyrights. When patent issues are addressed but are not copyright-free, there may be enough loopholes to cost the parties significant dollars, which are the subject of subsequent controversy.

Download PDF