The Supreme Court – The Big Lie

As it is with ‘case law’, the lawyer class that now runs America needs us to believe thatThe Supreme Court has the Constitutional power to interpret what laws are Constitutional.

This is The Foundational Lie
upon which The Lawyer Class has taken control of the American government and culture.
In order to pull off their legal scams and maintain control, they must have us believe that Their ‘Supreme’ Court makes the final decision.   Yes, 9 members of their exclusive ruling class; same schooling, same mindset, same void of common sense, same lack of American ingenuity, same lack of real life experiences,  same lack of respect for any document (even the US Constitution) or contract until They decide what it means.

You will always hear thatThe Supreme Court has the Constitutional power to interpret what laws are Constitutional.”  And as evidence they will cite Marbury v. Madison in 1803.  THIS IS A LIE!    And if anyone is aware that this is a lie it is the lawyers themselves who supposedly study The Constitution more than any one else.

The fact is that nowhere in The Constitution does it give this right to ‘The Supreme Court’:

Fact:  6 Lawyers on ‘The Supreme Court’ in Marbury vs. Madison (1803) GAVE THEMSELVES THE RIGHT TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION!
“… So when 6 lawyers, headed by Chief Justice John Marshall, were given ‘the opportunity to reserve supreme power amongst themselves in the new government’, human nature prevailed.   They decided that they will have final power in America even though it did not exist in the Constitution
This was recognized by none other than Thomas Jefferson when he commented on the Marbury v. Madison decision; Jefferson disagreed with Marshall’s reasoning in this case, saying that if this view of judicial power became accepted, it would be “placing us under the despotism of an oligarchy.” –   See:America is Now an Oligarchy

Of course all of the lawyers on TV and the media support this lie but what is astounding is how most other media and news personalities buy into it even though many of them have research staffs!   It takes all of 5 minutes to Google and expose this lie and to find out what the actual truth is.

I mean think about the ignorance and naivete of this ;  they all base their argument on Marbury vs. Madison.    Six lawyers in 1803 decided that They should make all final decisions in America!  The Constitution never says it and in fact the authors of The Constitution  and the Founding Fathers were adamantly against it:

The Supreme Court Must Be The Will of the People


This is a TV production of the Marbury case. It’s covers the history well including the fact that it was Marshall and the Court itself, and not The Constitution, that empowered them to decide the constitutionality of all laws – aka ‘judicial review.’ Jump to minute 27 to see how this was done and the audacity of John Marshal, the Chief Justice/Lawyer, when he says; ‘The only way to safeguard the Constitution is to put it in the hands of the Judiciary, not the Legislature and not the Executive” – Wow!!- The audacity of these lawyers goes way back to the beginning… You will then see Thomas Jefferson’s reaction and his prophetic admonition saying that if this view of judicial power became accepted, it would be “placing us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”
See: America is Now an Oligarchy

So next time anyone tells you what is or is not Constitutional, just ask them; “Says Who.”   If they are really interested in the answer of what the meaning of every Article of the Constitution is, they simply could refer to the Federalist Papers where it all is spelled out!


The Supreme Court is a Con

Posted by Sheriff Mack’s Constitutional Posse May 10, 2012

The Supreme Court operates as though it were a perpetual Constitutional Convention with the power and authority to change the Constitution whenever the nine member panel of lawyers determines that it is necessary. The Founders wanted to protect the rights of the people by limiting the power of the government.  In order to prevent the usurpation of power by the government the Founders required that in order to amend the Constitution, it would be necessary for three-fourths of the states to ratify proposed amendments.

If the Supreme Court makes a ruling that changes the meaning of the Constitution, they should also obtain the approval of three-fourths of the states.  Since “We the People” were supposed be sovereign, it is appropriate that the final arbiter of questions regarding the Constitution should be in the hands of the sovereigns.

The rulings of the Supreme Court are not the Supreme Law of the Land.  The Constitution as interpreted by the people through their elected representatives in Congress should be the ones to determine the meaning and intent of the Founding Fathers.

When Congress passes unconstitutional legislation, they collectively violate the oath that they have taken to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. When the Supreme Court allows them to violate the Constitution, the Court endorses the unconstitutional Congressional behavior.

When the President issues an Unconstitutional Executive Order and Congress allows him the authority to operate outside of his Constitutionally limited authority,they are guilty of Congressional misconduct.

When President signs a bill that is unconstitutional, he is guilty of violating his oath of office and in doing so, he is guilty of the high crime of treason.

If the Constitution written in 1776 was being properly enforced, I don’t believe that we would need any new amendments and an Article V Convention would be totally unnecessary.   Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has amended the Constitution every time they interpret it.  The authority to interpret the Constitution was NOT granted to the Supreme Court in the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall introduced the doctrine known as Judicial Review. He took the position that the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the meaning of the Constitution was an implied power that was both necessary and proper.
Allowing the Supreme Court to change the Constitution by interpreting it, gives the Court the power to amend the Constitution without a single state having to ratify it.   The Court is a perpetual Convention to Amend the Constitution.   Instead of needing two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states to agree, the nine lawyers in black robes need only vote 5-4 to amend the Constitution without the concurrence of a single state.



Download PDF

About the author

More posts by


1 Comment



Add a comment